On Tuesday 14 October 2003 08:01, Sean Millichamp wrote: > I think it sounds like a good idea but perhaps they should add their > name and by when they expect to be done processing the backport. It > would keep people from flooding emails asking "when" and also give an > indication if the person forgot/lost interest and abandoned the > project. If it ends up taking longer then they thought then they can > always go back and update the Wiki so everyone else knows they are > still on it. Good idea. Date next to the name would be included as well. See my other response for a slight variation of this idea. > Has anyone given any thought to if/how updates will be QA'd before a > general release to the Fedora Legacy repositories? Jef Spaleta is working on a new bug triage process for current Red Hat Bugzilla. This will also include some QA stuff. There has also been mentioned of a community QA process being developed and put in place for Fedora Core/Extras. I think Legacy could just use the same process. We'd have something similar to a rawhide for our test packages, they'd get QA'd by the community and unless problems were found, it'd be signed and dumped into the actual Legacy repo. Unfortunately, a lot of Legacy stuff is just waiting for FC and FE to work out their stuff. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00071.pgp
Description: signature
