On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:04:28PM +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > Warren Togami wrote : > > > It is my opinion that RH8 and RH9 should be upgraded to the latest > > versions for the respective distros. > > I totally agree. If it were only up to me, 7.x would also get rpm 4.1.1 or > 4.2.x as you then get much less hassles to have the most recent apt and yum > versions working. Have you checked the rpm 4.2/yum 2.0.4 version in ATrpms? That's exatcly what they are aiming at. > All my servers running 7.0 and 7.3 are now using rpm 4.1.1 and yum 2.0.x, > but I must admit that I got a weird problem on many of them after the > upgrade which required "rm -f /usr/lib/rpm/Pubkeys" to get rpm working > again... so I really wouldn't recommend mass-deploying that update in the > current state of things (rpm bug with sigs needing to be fixed?). I haven't seen that, if you have a spare 7.3 machine, could you test whether ATrpms' 4.2 rpms also mess up with the Pubkeys? Thanks! -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp00058.pgp
Description: PGP signature
