Re: "the rpm question" - summary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 08 November 2003 11:50 pm, Chuck Wolber wrote:
> > 4.) There needs to be some governance.  I propose a steering committee
> > based on merit: if you put up the bandwidth, you get a say in the
> > governance, etc.

> How about rather than resources put forth (which anyone with $$$ can do),
> we base merit on technical contributions *ONLY*? My concern is that a spot
> can be purchased rather than earned.

Amount of time spent on the project can also be bought.  Providing servers, 
bandwidth, and other infrastructure is essential for those times that, say, 
OpenSSH has a root compromise.  On the PostgreSQL project, Marc Fournier 
doesn't provide much in the way of developing code; but he provides the 
servers and the pipes.  Administering such is just as important a 
contribution as writing code would be; thus he got a spot (one of the first 
four).  But each project is different, and must find its own way.
-- 
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux