-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 07 November 2003 18:58, Edmund White wrote: > Either way, since these servers are humming along without incident, I > don't have much motivation to reinstall and move to an untested (by my > application's need) RHEL. Having continued support for RedHat 8 would be > very useful for those in my situation. I know this project is in its > infacy, but I think that 7.2-9.0 are must-support distributions. Please > advise. Our original thoughts were to include 7.3 and 9 support, since those were the most widely used of legacy releases, adn when initially talking over the Legacy system, nobody stepped up for 8.0/7.2. I've seen more and more interest in these products over the last couple days, so I'm going to say "It depends on the amount of volunteers we get". I know this is horribly vague, but hopefully it'll prompt some people to step up and state that they'll to the work necessary for 7.3/8.0. - -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/rHbo4v2HLvE71NURAiunAJ9xsTxny2XhmlBiLDVBZagQZUdwXQCfQsiI mOT0o12xAeaKt/y7hd99tls= =spL6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
