this is a best place for this thread -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: fedora-legacy agrees to enforce rpm upgrades? (was: Warren's Package Naming Proposal - Revision 1) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:20:02 -0800 From: Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx Organization: j2Solutions To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx References: <3FA229D3.4000104@xxxxxxxxxx> <20031107164717.GD27327@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311071505220.24992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Friday 07 November 2003 12:06, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Make it 3 then... I support Warren's suggestion. Perhaps others > will speak up too if it is something up for democratic vote. If > it's not up for democratic vote, hail Warren! Well, I think right now I'd have the final say, but I do differ to warren on a lot of issues. I'd have to dig up some old email, but there were some locking bugs and upgrade version issues that we wanted to solve with a single rpm version set across all the supported Legacy distros. Fedora.us has done a lot of research on it so I've been told, and they haven't found any reason to not fix these nasty bugs. So I'm going to be a bit totalitarian for a moment, and unless somebody can show me a really good reason to _not_ fix RPM across these release, then rpm will be upgraded. Note, this is not an upgrade just to upgrade, we're fixing bugs here. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating ---end-- -- HTML mails are going to trash automagically
Attachment:
file:///tmp/nsmail.tmp
Description: PGP signature
