On Friday 07 November 2003 08:47, Axel Thimm wrote: > While I personally support this scheme, I was under the impression > that there were more people against enforcing rpm upgrades for > minimally changes (e.g. fedora-legacy should only provide security > related errata). Especially because RH itself did not issue errata > for rpm despite the known problems. > > In fact, Warren, I believe we were the only two supporting rpm > upgrades, so unless we are the only left subscribers of > fedora-legacy, it is not yet an agreement of the whole list. ;) I personally agreed to it, until somebody showed me clear evidence that it could/would break something. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraLegacy) Mondo DevTeam (www.mondorescue.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
pgp00048.pgp
Description: signature
