Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] DRAFT for Press Release 1.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: <fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] DRAFT for Press Release 1.3
From: "Ingo T. Storm" <ingo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:42:46 +0100
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311061433590.1687-100000@bailey.scraps.org> <1068158662.2636.21.camel@bahama>
Reply-to: fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: fedora-legacy-list-admin@xxxxxxxxxx

>Why not RH 7.2?

I'd vote for trying to do 7.2 and 7.3, too. Of course this is entirely
egoistic, since it touches my two problem kids: rh7.2axp and Aurora SPARC
Linux.

Ingo

References:
- Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] DRAFT for Press Release 1.3
  - From: Chuck Wolber
- Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] DRAFT for Press Release 1.3
  - From: Peter Peltonen

Prev by Date: Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Re: Delay? Looks bad for Fedora
Next by Date: list of EOL RHL distributions or based
Previous by thread: Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] Supported versions
Next by thread: Re: [Fedora-legacy-list] DRAFT for Press Release (again)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite Questions]

Powered by Linux