On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 12:04:32AM +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote: > Peter Peltonen wrote: > > > Why not RH 7.2? If the 7.3 updates are going to be ported from AS which > > is based on 7.2, it should be trivial to provide updates for 7.2 > > also...? > > but, who are going to do the job? This is a *volunteer project* This gave me an idea, clearly we are all interested on different versions, I believe the easiest way to determine which versions will be supported is something along this lines: Create a "register" of volunteers for each version, this can be in the wiki or elsewhere, in which someone can go and say I'm willing to volunteer time/machines/QA/all for x,y and z versions. This can be easily counted, and then on each version the interested parties can be counted, and thus the feasability is seen immediately, rather than by arguments as which version is "certified" by this or that company. So far: - Seth mentioned his intentions in 7.3 and 9 - I mention my intentions in 9 for "all" (creating errata, compiling them and QA of others' errata) This should be trivial to do with a webform and PHP or perl and some simple db, I could make it, in case the wiki is not useful for this. Carlos
