On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 06:27:16PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > On Sun, 2003-11-02 at 21:37, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > Specifically what versions of RH have you seen the everlasting lock > > > bug? > > > > Any, otherwise it would not be `everlasting', would it ;) > > (O.K., any above 4.0.x) > > > > > What procedure would cause it? I ran into this too many months > > > ago, but recently haven't been able to reproduce it. jbj still insists > > > to this day that we're all crazy and this bug didn't exist. > > > > Then stress test your environment with a couple of > > > > while true; do rpm -qa > /dev/null; done > > > > And then issue rpm -Uhv or rpm -e in another terminal.. > > > > Or simply jump to bugzilla.redhat.com, and check the severn/FC1 test > > product for some more recent lockup reports. > > Oh, this is a completely different bug. The problem I was running into > were the locks completely broken iff NPTL and upgrading to rpm-4.2-1 > under earlier RH9 kernels. A reboot or rm -rf /var/lib/rpm/__* seemed > to fix the problem, until you upgrade or downgrade rpm. > > This problem seems to have gone away completely without explanation. Jeff removed O_DIRECT a few weeks after releasing the first 4.2-1, but didn't bump the release up (e.g. used the same EVR on rpm.org). Caused a lot of tears ... -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp00028.pgp
Description: PGP signature
