On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:16:19AM -0800, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 10:24:53PM -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > > RH9 -> rpm-4.2.1 > > Uh, what about epoch promotion? Imagine this scenario: Yes, that's a valid point. I hope 4.2.1 can be switched to use epoch promotion again, but maybe the code has been ripped out. Without epoch promotion rpm 4.2.1 is like a bomb on RH <= 9. -- Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgp00024.pgp
Description: PGP signature
