Quoting Eric Rostetter <rostetter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Quoting Carlos Villegas <villegas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > I'm not a lawyer, but that example (personalized binary) clearly would > > violate the GPL, if the original code is GPL, then any derivative work is > > GPL (personlized source that produced the binary), as such you are entitled > > to that source and can redistribute it and modify it as you please. > > Not always. If I personalize it with copyrighted/tradmarked material, you > are entitled to the source still, but you can not sell it to others with my > copyrighted/trademarked materials inside. It's a bit vague if you give it > away, but generally that is also a bad thing. Actually, that probably isn't true in most cases for copyrighted material. But it does apply to trademarked material, or material licensed other other terms/conditions/licenses. Sorry about that. -- Eric Rostetter
