Upon re-reading, I realized my previous post contained an inaccurate statement. Please allow me to correct myself: >> No, they have not. In fact, they have stated the opposite. Not all of >> it is GPL'd. And some of it is subject to copyright and trademark law. > > Perhaps you have been living in a hole? They have said this time and time > again. What you are probably confusing is that they have also publically > stated that they have no qualms about *INCLUDING* closed source software > in their distribution. They themselves respect the force of the OSS > community and will make all of their *OWN* code GPL'd. Please also note > that this has nothing to do with their logos and trademarks. I shouldn't have said RedHat will GPL all of their code. I have no documentation to this effect. I believe Eric was correct when he originally stated that RedHat has always pledged to make the source code available, but that RedHat has never made an exclusive commitment to any given license when it comes to code developed in-house. Sorry for that. -Chuck
