Hi Pete, On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 19:01 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 03:08:21 +0100, Jacob Kroon <jacob.kroon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > usb 4-3: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 > > ehci_hcd 0000:00:10.3: Unlink after no-IRQ? Controller is probably using the wrong IRQ. > > usb 4-3: device not accepting address 2, error -110 > > It seems like a very clear case of IRQ routing being busted. > > > Using kernel-2.6.18-1.2798.fc6 with default kernel arguments wifi works, > > but USB wont work. Using kernel-2.6.18-1.2849.fc6 it's the other way > > around. > > Outstanding on narrowing down the releases. Now "all you need" is to > prep the two source trees and find the offending change... which might > not be very easy, unfortunately, beacuse the old .src.rpm are not > kept anywhere that I know... > > Why don't you file a bug and list those two kernel versions. > Someone with the access to CVS should be able to do two checkouts > and find differences. In fact, I may be able to look once a have > an hour or so. I've filed the bug here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219034 I've attached the output of "dmesg" for the three different boot setups I've tested. Not being a kernel hacker, I'm a little skeptical to doing the tree diffs myself in search of what changed :) I'll be more than happy to provide additional information. Regards Jacob _______________________________________________ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
