From: Philipp Rudo on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2917#note_1758222573 I'm also not convinced that having all the addons in a single config file makes sense. I'm looking at it from an kdump perspective. There we need to have the crashkernel=<size> parameter on the command line. Where <size> varies depending on the used hardware/setup. The only solution I came up with so far is to spam the system with a big number of predefined <size>'s so users can pick the one they need. But IIUC this would require a huge amount of almost identical addon definitions in the config, which I don't think makes sense. Why don't you use a filesystem based structure similar to the kernel configs? Where the filename becomes the addon name, a comment replaces the description and, every following line is a command line to be signed. -- _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
