From: Don Zickus on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2832#note_1684685920 This seems to conflict with Fedora's principle here a little. I believe Fedora purposely enables all drivers for an arch and thus is not interested in package size. The idea is that Fedora can cater to anyone who has the hardware (and the distro maintenance is low). Forcing the options off, while it makes sense makes me wonder what the line in Fedora is for enabling/disabling drivers? ELN/RHEL it is obvious: support. I feel like I am missing an angle here. Re-reading the changelog multiple times (I can follow the logic), I think I am stuck on who decides 'unnecessary'? Perhaps I am not convinced of the problem statement (I think if I was, the approach makes sense and I would have to think if that is a reasonable implementation). I don't know. Help? -- _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
