From: Scott Weaver on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/2606#note_1492595138 The current logic used to mark a driver deprecated is that if in a future release that driver is marked unmaintained or disabled then we mark it as deprecated. In the comment that defines deprecation, we say `"this driver is planned to be unmaintained in a future major release, and will eventually be disabled"`. IMO it is just this statement being reiterated in the `init_fn_unmaintained` comment. It seems to me that we can soften the language to say that it `"might be disabled"`. Being unmaintained, from what I've seen, doesn't mean it will definitely be disabled but it does make it a candidate for being disabled in a future release. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
