On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 8:58 AM stan via kernel
<kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 07:23:39 -0500
> Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I am guessing this is because you turned on a build of kernel-tools
> > with it? libnl3 is only needed for kernel tools (the intel_sdsi build
> > is also kernel-tools only).
>
> Yeah, I build kernel-tools so that everything is aligned. But I have
> been building with kernel-tools all along without issue. Must be
> something new in 5.18 (this is my first build of a 5.18 kernel).
>
> > As to the issues with intel_sdsi, Today
> > would be the first fedora build, so I have not looked at what the
> > issues might be. It looks like it failed Friday for the same reason
> > in the ELN build though. I had not even checked, as the 5.17.2 builds
> > and the 5.16.19 builds and resulting activities kept me busy. Perhaps
> > Prarit might have some insight?
>
> I look forward to the analysis, and a fix. :-)
Coming soon to the kernel-ark repo, but the fix is easy in the spec:
diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
index fb67ab956..515942496 100755
--- a/kernel.spec
+++ b/kernel.spec
@@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ chmod +x tools/power/cpupower/utils/version-gen.sh
%{make} CFLAGS+="-D_GNU_SOURCE -Iinclude -I/usr/include/libnl3"
popd
pushd tools/arch/x86/intel_sdsi
- %{make}
+ %{tools_make}
popd
%endif
%endif
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
