Re: [PATCH v9 05/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: groundwork

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:09 AM Huang, Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, Yu,
>>
>> Yu Zhao <yuzhao@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> > diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> > index 3326ee3903f3..747ab1690bcf 100644
>> > --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> > +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> > @@ -892,6 +892,16 @@ config ANON_VMA_NAME
>> >         area from being merged with adjacent virtual memory areas due to the
>> >         difference in their name.
>> >
>> > +# the multi-gen LRU {
>> > +config LRU_GEN
>> > +     bool "Multi-Gen LRU"
>> > +     depends on MMU
>> > +     # the following options can use up the spare bits in page flags
>> > +     depends on !MAXSMP && (64BIT || !SPARSEMEM || SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
>>
>> LRU_GEN depends on !MAXSMP.  So, What is the maximum NR_CPUS supported
>> by LRU_GEN?
>
> LRU_GEN doesn't really care about NR_CPUS. IOW, it doesn't impose a
> max number. The dependency is with NODES_SHIFT selected by MAXSMP:
>     default "10" if MAXSMP
> This combined with LAST_CPUPID_SHIFT can exhaust the spare bits in page flags.


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux