Re: [OS-BUILD PATCHv4 0/8] process_configs.sh: Add parallel processing of configs in dist-configs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1635#note_860805559

>I just tested this and it is a nice speed up. Thanks!  However it isn't
controlled by the -j flag.  It doesn't matter what -jX you use, the script by
design just runs every invocation of the script in the background and then
waits.  I happen to have 12 cpus, so I couldn't notice if the 13 configs had a
bottleneck.
>
>You might want to test on a 4 cpu machine and see what it looks like or
implement logic to actually use -jX.

Thanks for catching this.  Using your test of comparing 'make -j1' vs
'make -j' I now get

make -j1:

real    1m12.901s
user    1m6.587s
sys     1m58.831s

make -j:

real    0m11.277s
user    0m29.622s
sys     0m25.264s

I've pushed a new version.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux