[sending this a second time with a different "From" address to get it on the list; sorry!] Lo! On 08.02.22 20:24, Donald Zickus wrote: > > It has been awhile since we changed how this mailing list is used. As > folks have noticed, we have increased traffic significantly over the > past couple of years to reflect the activity Red Hat developers are > performing on the Fedora kernel. > > My question to this list is around the thoughts of this activity: > * Is there too much noise? Should we throttle back? > * is the volume ok? Folks have good filters? > * Other suggestions on how we use this list? > > Trying to continue to make this mailing list useful. > > Thanks for any feedback! The mails are not a big problem for me, but they are related to a bigger question that again and again pops up in my head: Is it really a good idea to have all those totally RHEL specific patches in the Fedora rpm (and thus discussed here)? And does that approach mean that Red Hat is special, or are willing to include downstream patches for other distros as well? Say Amazon Linux? How is this handled in other packages? Or is it an issue that only happens with the kernel? Sure, Fedora is mainly sponsored by Red Hat and all Fedora kernel developers are working for Red Hat, but somehow it feels to me like a boundary was overstepped. Ciao, Thorsten _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
