On Thu, 05 Aug 2021 02:33:57 -0000 "Sampson Fung" <sampsonfung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > rpm -qa and dnf list installed return the same result. Thanks for the info, looks like you are in business. > Regarding the kernel.spec issue, I reported it as > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1990129 > > Change the below from 1 to 0 allow rpmbuild to finish building the > kernel RPM packages. > > diff kernel.spec.dist kernel.spec.works > 202c202 > < %define with_configchecks %{?_without_configchecks: 0} > %{?!_without_configchecks: 1} --- > > %define with_configchecks %{?_without_configchecks: 0} > > %{?!_without_configchecks: 0} It might get accepted, though the policy of the fedora kernel team has been that anyone who builds their own kernels is on their own. It makes sense because there are so many combinatorial possibilities. But maybe it has changed. > If I want to learn how to read kernel.spec, where should I start? Well, the first thing is to understand the spec file organization. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/Packagers_Guide/sect-Packagers_Guide-Creating_a_Basic_Spec_File.html I'm not aware of any spec file documentation specific to the kernel. I think it is institutional awareness within the fedora kernel team. You can create a new thread here on the kernel list with something like "can you point me to documentation of the kernel spec file" as the subject, and maybe someone with more knowledge than me will give you links to such documentation, if it exists. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
