Hi, On 7/29/21 2:44 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 6:48 AM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Every now and then I sync the .config for the kernels which I build locally >> with the Fedora kernel's .config . >> >> After downloading kernel-core-5.14.0-0.rc3.20210728git7d549995d4e0.31.fc35.x86_64.rpm >> and extracting the /lib/modules/5..../config file I noticed that all the debug >> options seem to be enabled. >> >> AFAIK those should only be enabled for the kernel-debug-core variant ? >> So this seems to be a bug. >> > > This is incorrect, and has never been the case for rawhide, or at > least not in the last 10 years. For rawhide, the first build of any > given rc is built as a release kernel with separate debug kernels. > Any "git snapshot" kernel is built as a debug kernel only. For > example, kernel-5.14.0-0.rc3.29.fc35 has both debug and nondebug > variants built, but > kernel-5.14.0-0.rc3.20210728git7d549995d4e0.31.fc35 only has debug > kernels. In the past, we did not even have a subpackage named > kernel-debug, but not too long ago, some people asked that we create a > meta package so that people who only wanted to run debug kernels could > keep kernel-debug installed, and it would always point to the correct > option. This was MR > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1133 Ah, that is what was causing my confusion since there are now both a kernel-core-5... and a kernel-debug-core-5... pkgs in rawhide I assumed (going by the name) that rawhide was now always doing normal + debug builds like how the build for the released Fedora versions are done (assuming I got that right). Thank you for explaining this. I must say that this rawhide now having both kernel-core-5... and a kernel-debug-core-5... pkgs, but the kernel-core-5... pkgs sometimes being debug builds and sometimes not is quite confusing. I was aware that rawhide was doing the debug-builds except for the first-build of any rc thing, but that was before the merge-req which you point to which introduces having both kernel-core-5... and kernel-debug-core-5... pkgs, like the released branches have. If we're going to do that would it then not be more consistent (and simpler in the spec file?) to always to a debug + non-debug build in rawhide like how we are doing for the released branches ? Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
