Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] all: Changing CONFIG_UV_SYSFS to build uv_sysfs.ko as a loadable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:22 AM Prarit Bhargava (via Email Bridge)
<cki-gitlab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Prarit Bhargava on gitlab.com
> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/merge_requests/1165#note_592074102
>
> Would it hurt to switch Fedora to "is not set" with a note to THIS MR so we
> can point to this simple discussion in the future?
>
> Just a thought.

Fedora already "is not set" so there is nothing to change there. I
don't have an issue with a note being added, and honestly I am not too
concerned with what HPE supports. If we have users requesting it be
turned on because they feel like experimenting, I can turn it on. I
just haven't had anyone ask, and assume no one is wanting to run
Fedora in this environment.

Justin
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux