From: David Ward on gitlab.com https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/42#note_555101078 Ok, that's what I had assumed. Can we make the naming consistent though, while still accomplishing that? I'm suggesting we build non-releases using `--with-dbgonly`. Then either we: - follow the branched naming scheme — so non-releases only produce packages named `kernel-debug`, while releases also produce packages named `kernel`; or - invert the branched naming scheme — so non-releases only produce packages named `kernel`, while releases also produce packages named `kernel-nodebug` I'm not sure what you mean by the no-debug repository? All packages are going into the mirrors now, e.g.: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everyt hing/source/tree/Packages/k/kernel-5.12.0-0.rc7.20210416git7e25f40eab52. 191.fc35.src.rpm so someone who has the "kernel" package installed and upgrades it is constantly switching from a debug build to a non-debug build. _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
