On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:40 PM stan via kernel <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Oct 2020 10:54:12 -0500 > Justin Forbes <jforbes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > It shouldn't be a merge request anyway, kernel-5.9.0-300 has > > nothing to do > > with ark. It is based on the F32 spec, with most of the RHELisms > > stripped out. Anything relating to the build of kernel-tools is > > bitrot because Fedora doesn't build kernel-tools from the kernel srpm > > or kernel.spec. This will likely change with the 5.10 rebases as we > > move to a src-git model, though still entirely possible that stable > > updates will fail on tools because we just don't build it. > > kernel-tools.spec is the appropriate place to build gpio-watch in > > Fedora. > > OK, I only mentioned it because the last 5.9 development kernel didn't > have the issue. From what you say above I think that is because > development kernels and stable kernels use different spec files, right? > I like to update everything in synch, kernel, headers, tools, etc. > whether they need it or not. I guess I'll have to start building them > separately from the src.rpms if the kernel spec gets too out of date. > Right, the 5.9 development kernel was built from rawhide, which does include these things because ELN needs them. The 5.9.0-300 is in a stable branch where all of that is stripped. I don't just copy the spec back to old releases, I only move bring back patches, configs, and filter changes generally. Justin _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
