Re: [OS-BUILD PATCH] redhat: Add dummy-module kernel module

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:38:58AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 5/21/20 9:37 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 09:27:35AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >> On 5/21/20 9:18 AM, Jiri Benc wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 21 May 2020 08:31:56 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> >>>> We've used it (heavily might I add) to debug the kernel.  It's a convenient
> >>>> place for a quick kernel module.
> >>>
> >>> Now I'm curious. How does such module help debugging the kernel?
> >>>
> >>> I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm just saying I can't think of anything.
> >>> Probably just me not being imaginative enough. More details would be
> >>> appreciated. It might come handy one time.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well it's literally everything from dumping random values to confirming
> >> alignment of structs to debugging.
> >>
> >> What I'm doing today is attempting to break the Intel Split Lock detector by running
> >>
> >>         for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpu_ids; cpu++) {
> >>                 c = &cpu_data(cpu);
> >>                 printk("data for cpu %d\n", cpu);
> >>                 for (i = 0; i < (NCAPINTS + NBUGINTS * 32); i++) {
> >>                         cpu_has(c, i);
> >>                 }
> >>         }
> >>
> >> in a tight loop.  Unfortunately that doesn't seem to kick it.  I suspect that
> >> the cpuinfo_x86 struct is magically aligned atm :(.
> >>
> >> I guess I could keep the dummy-module in it's own tree but that's just a PITA
> >> when I have to quickly debug something.  Let's keep it in the tree where it's
> >> always been ;)
> >>
> > I remember using this module quite alot, and it was very helpful.  I have to ask
> > though, does systemtap offer the same level of functionality at this point for
> > most of the debugging we need to do?
> > 
> 
> Yup!  But I have had many cases when I'm digging for HW register values, etc.,
> that a module has been _invaluable_.
> 
Good enough then, Ive got no problem with it.

Neil

> P.
> 
> > Neil
> > 
> >> P.
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>  Jiri
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> 
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux