On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 2:37 PM Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 8/19/19 3:29 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to get the following test patch in a Rawhide kernel as > > a one off for testing? Or is that a PITA? Ordinarily I'd just build a > > kernel myself locally, but that build machine is in a very confused > > Rawhide<-->Branched state and so I can't. > > > > But that led me to wonder about the general case of whether it's > > ordinary to request test patches for testing in Rawhide kernels, or if > > such things considered out of scope until they get merged? > > > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=284507&action=diff > > > > We generally prefer not to bring in patches for testing in rawhide. > It's easy to bring a patch in but much harder to drop one. > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37168533 > Here's a scratch build that should have the patch. I'm testing that now and will report back in the upstream bug. If the second patch they proposed gets built into a scratch build, I'll test it also. Otherwise I'll put it in my own queue once I get this Rawhide test system unconfused. thanks, -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
