On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 16:28 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > So if you want to use git apply instead of patch, I have no objections > that I can remember. It'll just require some extra work to make sure > the git repo actually exists and that doesn't break other things. Git apply doesn't need a git repo. It is designed to be a patch replacement. (There's probably a lot of legacy stuff patch handles that "git apply" doesn't, but no-one cares.) Thanks, Paul Bolle _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
