2017-02-16 19:33 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 2017-02-16 19:26 GMT+01:00 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> ---
>> kernel.spec | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
>> index 4363050..38968ba 100644
>> --- a/kernel.spec
>> +++ b/kernel.spec
>> @@ -815,7 +815,6 @@ Summary: Development package for building kernel modules to match the %{?2:%{2}
>> Group: System Environment/Kernel\
>> Provides: kernel%{?1:-%{1}}-devel-%{_target_cpu} = %{version}-%{release}\
>> Provides: kernel-devel-%{_target_cpu} = %{version}-%{release}%{?1:+%{1}}\
>> -Provides: kernel-devel = %{version}-%{release}%{?1:+%{1}}\
>> Provides: kernel-devel-uname-r = %{KVERREL}%{?variant}%{?1:+%{1}}\
>> Provides: installonlypkg(kernel)\
>> AutoReqProv: no\
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>
> So, this was the "light description version" of the patch.
> please see a full rationale here http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1420754
> Basically, this patch make the situation in sync with el7 kernel WRT
> theses provides.
> There is one virtual provides kernel-devel-uname-r
> Other are real (packages) provides.
>
> That will restore the ability to prefer one kernel-devel varriant over
> another one as (such as kernel-debug-devel).
> In the current situation every kernel-devel varriant have this
> kernel-devel (virtual) provide.
Any answer from the kernel team about this ?
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
