Re: Kernel configurations for Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:46:00AM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The Fedora kernel has had roughly the same system for generating
> the kernel configuration for a very long time. There are a series
> of files listing configuration choices (CONFIG_FOO=y, CONFIG_FOO
> is not set etc.) that get combined to generate the final config
> files. This has gotten unsustainable for several reasons:
> 
> - When the system was first introduced, the only supported
> arches were x86_32 and x86_64. Fedora now supports enough
> other arches that we have a config-$arch-generic in addition to
> config-generic
> - It's difficult to tell what is actually enabled since
> there are several layers of configuration combining (I have to
> look at config-generic, then config-$arch-generic, then
> the final config-$specific file to see what the option actually
> is)
> - Keeping the files organized requires manual work and pruning
> 
> I've been thinking about alternatives to the existing config
> generation. One proposal was to take advantage of the upstream
> kernel now supporting config fragments and keep some part of
> the fedora configuration upstream. This would have the disadvantage
> of requiring the configuration to be kept in sync with upstream.
> 
> Another option is to switch to a system of generation where
> each configuration option is kept in a separate file. There
> is no sorting or organization necessary. This would result
> in a lot of small files for all the arches Fedora supports though.

Hi Laura,

Just to throw it out there,  RHEL has been using the one option per file
mechanism for years now with success.  Minimizes the maintenance and
conflicts.  ( I know you already know that, just wanted to publicly state
that).

The volume of files is large, but it is hidden away and you only package the
resulting kernel.config files into the src.rpm.

Just a thought.

Cheers,
Don

> 
> Anyone have experiences with or opinions about the kernel
> configuration generation? The goal is to only change the way
> the configurations are generated and not the options that are
> enabled.
> 
> Thanks,
> Laura
> _______________________________________________
> kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list -- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to kernel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux