On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/10/2016 03:42 PM, Miguel Flores Silverio wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Miguel Flores Silverio <floresmigu3l@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> scripts/fast-build.sh | 13 +++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >> create mode 100755 scripts/fast-build.sh >> >> diff --git a/scripts/fast-build.sh b/scripts/fast-build.sh >> new file mode 100755 >> index 0000000..19eaa4d >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/scripts/fast-build.sh >> @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ >> +#! /bin/sh >> +# Description: >> +# rpmbuild combo to build the given architecture with >> +# no debugging information, perf and tools. >> +# >> +# Sample usage: >> +# ./fast-build.sh x86_64 kernel-4.7.0-0.rc1.git1.2.fc25.src.rpm >> + >> +if [ -z "$1" ] || [ -z "$2" ]; then >> + echo "usage: $0 [ arch ] [ kernel-x.x.x.fcxx.src.rpm ] " >> +fi >> + >> +rpmbuild --target $1 --without debuginfo --without perf --without tools --rebuild $2 >> -- > > Is the --target really necessary? Why not just do $(arch)? Not following that question. > FWIW jboyer ... I'm leaning towards Jarod's comment on whether or not this is > necessary. Why not put in a comment in the spec on this? Because the spec is a nightmare of text and confusion for anyone that hasn't spent a week staring at it. If we want to get really picky, it's one of the worst spec files in Fedora aside from gcc. There are many reasons why it is so, but new users don't know those reasons and frankly don't care. If someone wants to tackle that beast, I'm all for massive improvements that leave all the pieces functional. > OTOH ... it's a small > script so why I am complaining? :) I'm ignoring your complaining. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
