Re: kdbus module being removed from Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, November 03, 2015 02:34:34 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 29, 2015 07:36:13 PM Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >> 
> >> We will be removing the kdbus driver from Rawhide kernels before the
> >> 4.3 final release upstream.  Realistically, this means kdbus will be
> >> gone from Fedora by Monday November 2nd at the latest.  If you have a
> >> setup using kdbus, please adjust it accordingly.
> >> 
> >> The upstream developers asked me to remove the module from Fedora
> >> while they rethink some of the approach they are taking with kdbus.
> > 
> > This is just a heads-up ...
> > 
> > In the future we need to be careful when re-enabling kdbus in Fedora
> > kernels so that we ensure the necessary SELinux access controls are in
> > place at the same time.  Without the proper LSM/SELinux access controls,
> > kdbus provides a communication channel which could violate SELinux
> > security policies and prevent a nasty regression with respect to access
> > control.
> 
> That's fine, but I think we already knew that?  I mean, the suggestion
> was to disable SELinux entirely (or at least put it in permissive
> mode) when we added it to begin with.  It is also one of the reasons
> we limited it to rawhide only.  I wouldn't want to ship it in a
> release without SELinux support working.

Consider it just a reminder then ... inclusion w/o SELinux support in Rawhide 
is fine, I just didn't want to see it slip into proper release without proper 
SELinux support.

> > I've been trying to work with the upstream kdbus developers on better
> > notification/review of their next attempt, but the results thus far have
> > been less than inspiring.  There is a non-trivial chance that we may end
> > up with kdbus in an upstream kernel release before we have the
> > LSM/SELinux hooks ready for inclusion.
> 
> Hopefully that isn't the case.  With the developers taking time to
> rethink things, maybe keeping up the communication will help things
> land at the same time.

Yes, that is my hope too, but recent conversations have not made me overly 
optimistic about this.

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux