Re: initramfs vs installer initrd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was usually under the impression that it was at this point just a nomenclature
> thing.  Initrds used to be fs image files that were mounted via loopback block
> devices while initramfs files are cpio files that are copied into a tmpfs file
> system.  I thought both dracut and kernel install targets used initramfs at this
> point, but the latter just kept the naming for convienience.
>
> Note, I've always just assumed this, not directly checked, so I may be wrong.
>
> Neil

AFAIK this is correct. I don't think anything actually uses initrd
anymore but the name has stuck around - to refer to either initrd or
initramfs. Even the plymouth initrd image is actually an initramfs (I
believe).

Some reading for the interested:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.txt
https://www.linux.com/learn/linux-training/92607-the-kernel-newbie-corner-qinitrdq-and-qinitramfsq-whats-up-with-that


- Donavan
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux