On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:57:53AM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 10:08:14PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 03:49:18PM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 09:39 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209492 (an to this email) > > > > > to revert the yama config setting to the upstream default. This fixes > > > > > > > > That would make the sysctl file systemd just added on your request > > > > completely pointless and actually incorrect because changing the value > > > > wouldn't work at all. > > > > > > Yes, that is a downside of the patch. You won't be able to switch the > > > default value anymore. But if we cannot do that by installing the sysctl > > > file in either the kernel or systemd the alternative would be to hunt > > > down and fix all individually packages that rely on ptrace working > > > normally. Which seems unattractive to me if the fix in the kernel is so > > > simple. > > > > It took some time but we eventually came up with a solution. Stephen > > Smalley who added the support for yama originally to the fedora kernel > > agrees with the approach. And Paul Moore is making sure this gets merged > > upstream. Attached are commits for f22, f23 and master. Please let me know > > if you need anything else to get these applied. > So... yama consists of one thing, the ptrace scope setting. > Your patch sets the ptrace scope setting back to 0. So yama > would be compiled in, but disabled. Yes, see the bug report for the (very long) discussion of why. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
