On Sat, 16.05.15 22:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 05:11:15PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On May 8, 2015 11:38 AM, "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 10:08:56PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: > > > > > Hmm. If don't know off the top of my head if Fedora cloud images > > have a > > > > > separate /boot or not, but disk space is a big concern in such > > > > > environments. > > > > > > > > They don't have a separate boot, fwiw. > > > What about amending the patch to use > > > > > > cp --reflink=auto ... > > > > > > ? > > > > The kernel-install tool is what would need to be patched. It is what is > > doing the copying at install time. Doing it in the spec is pointless as > > we're mucking around in the build root not the actual system. > Strictly speaking, using --reflink=auto would be useful in the spec > too, to avoid copying the files. In a build root it is very likely to > succeed too. > > But you're right of course, it's kernel-install that counts. > > Patches for kernel-install and dracut attached. > > [Since this patch is for systemd, resending it to systemd-devel. I should > have done in the first place. If intend to push it in a few days if nobody > objects.] --reflink=auto is the default in cp since a while. Instead of cluttering systemd's or dracut's trees with it, I'd rather recommend upgrading coreutils as necessary. I don't think this should go in, Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
