Re: no fsck for unmounted filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193203

most strange thing is that even mount the partition again fails because the OS pretends it's already mountd or in use, the issue trying to mount again don't happen predictable but i need to reboot that amchine now or the next kernel update will end in a tragedy

Am 16.02.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 16.02.2015 um 16:50 schrieb Eric Sandeen:
On 2/16/15 4:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
/dev/sda1 is a ordinary partition containing only /boot
why does the kernel report it is in use?
if that would be true it could not be unmounted
___________________________________________

[root@asterisk:~]$ /usr/sbin/fsck.ext4 -f /dev/sda1
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
/dev/sda1 is in use.
e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.

I just saw a similar report on #ext4; do you still have a jbd
thread running for this filesystem?

this is a ext2 filesystem

[root@mail-gw:~]$ ps aux | grep jbd
root       203  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Feb15   0:00
[jbd2/sdb1-8]
root       343  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Feb15   0:00
[jbd2/sdc1-8]
root       347  0.0  0.0      0     0 ?        S    Feb15   0:00
[jbd2/sdd1-8]
root     20398  0.0  0.0 112688  2228 pts/2    R<+  16:56   0:00
/usr/bin/grep --color jbd

[root@mail-gw:~]$ df
Dateisystem    Typ  Größe Benutzt Verf. Verw% Eingehängt auf
/dev/sdb1      ext4  5,8G    1,6G  4,2G   28% /
/dev/sdc1      ext4  4,0G    493M  3,5G   13% /var/log
/dev/sdd1      ext4  2,0G    4,4M  2,0G    1% /var/spool
/dev/sda1      ext4  493M     36M  458M    8% /boot


Also, in the spirit of useful bug reporting, what kernel
are you running?

always the lastest fedora kernel
3.18.7-100.fc20.x86_64

Can you run strace of e2fsck, and see if an open(O_EXCL) fails,
or find some other hint about how e2fsck decided it was in
use?  Possibly paste the last couple hundred lines of strace
somewhere.

i will try that on a non-production machine

This may be better suited for a bug report, or a thread on
linux-ext4, than the fedora-kernel list.

yes, my intention was to first ask if the problem is known and maybe
even a solution inthe pipeline and if not finally catch the needed infos
like the strace in the initial bugreport

after it's created i will respond to this post with the link

FWIW, the errors below do look indicative of a filesystem
that has never had the superblock written out during an
actual unmount...

likely because the -n param

the corruption itself may come from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192834 which is also really
strange

________________________________________

[root@asterisk:~]$ lsof | grep /dev/sda1
[root@asterisk:~]$
___________________________________________

[root@asterisk:~]$ /usr/sbin/fsck.ext4 -n /dev/sda1
e2fsck 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014)
Warning!  /dev/sda1 is in use.
boot was not cleanly unmounted, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Pass 5: Checking group summary information
Free blocks count wrong (454751, counted=469570).
Fix? no

Free inodes count wrong (130215, counted=130220).
Fix? no

boot: 345/130560 files (22.6% non-contiguous), 66464/521215 blocks

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux