Re: F21: building kernels from srpms is broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 08/26/2014 01:47 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 08/26/2014 01:30 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Steve Dickson <SteveD@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> When build kernel from the source rpm I
>>> get the following depmod failure:
>>>
>>> + depmod -b . -aeF ./System.map 3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64
>>> + '[' -s depmod.out ']'
>>> + echo 'Depmod failure'
>>> Depmod failure
>>> + cat depmod.out
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_new_lockspace
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_unlock
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_release_lockspace
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_posix_unlock
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_posix_get
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_lock
>>> depmod: WARNING: /home/steved/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/kernel-3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/./lib/modules/3.16.1-301.fc20.x86_64/kernel/fs/gfs2/gfs2.ko needs unknown symbol dlm_posix_lock
>>> + exit 1
>>>
>>> What needs to happen to get this fixed? Should I open up a bz or
>>> open up a ticket somewhere? Please tell me where to go... nicely! ;-)
>>
>> Didn't we discuss all of this in #fedora-kernel yesterday?  Did the
>> advice we gave there not work, or?
> Yes.. Your advice was to use 'fedpkg local' which does indeed work but
> it also builds a bunch of rpms I don't need or use, like debug kernels.
> 
> When I rpmbuild from a srpm I use the following flags
>    --without extra --without tools --without debug --without perf --without headers
> 
> which greatly decrease the compiling time... from 70mins to 30mins
> depending on the machine... 
> 
> Now if I can set those flags in the fedpkg local build... Then
> I'm good to go...

Also, I can use the resulting source tree for debugging... (aka 
recompile modules after modifying the code)

steved.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux