On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Al Dunsmuir <al.dunsmuir@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> but removing the ability to build ppc32 at all seems excessive, and >>>> certainly premature given the current situation. >> >>> Which is why I sent it as a patch instead of simply committed it. >>> Discussion is requested. At a minimum though, I really would like to >>> drop the -smp flavor because it was of very limited use even when ppc >>> was a primary arch and it adds the most complication to the spec. >> >> Thanks for clarifying that. >> >> The problem with dropping smp is that I and other have smp hardware >> that we would like to use. That is also likely the hardware that > > Yes, I've seen that. I'm willing to hold off on the removal for a bit > to see how quickly your effort gets off the ground. I won't wait > forever though. So it's been not quite 2 months yet and I haven't seen or heard anything about this being worked on. How is the ppc32 effort going and who is working on it? josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
