Re: Would building netconsole in for debug kernels make sense?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 09:25:01 -0400,
 Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Even building it all (netconsole+dependent network drivers) isn't typically
enough, since you also need to bring the network interface up and assign an ip
address to it, which happens fairly late in the boot cycle.  If you have a crash
that occurs so early that you're thinking about doing this, a RAC device with
serial console support is usually a better bet.

The documentation implies that you don't need an IP assigned before you can use netconsole, since that information can be provided with kernel parameters. I don't know whether or not it really works that way though.

That said, it would be nice if dracut had a module that allowed you to include
netconsole so that you could set it up before you did a switch_root.

The confir for dracut allows for you to include kernel drivers in the initramfs. So you should be able to use netconsole before root pivet. You might need to worry about the interface name changing part way through the boot.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux