On Friday, May 16, 2014, 4:41:51 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Al Dunsmuir <al.dunsmuir@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Because of branding, I would certainly prefer that ppc32 remain under >> the Fedora umbrella as a seconday-secondary tertiary architecture >> rather than be forced to become a remix. > Branding? My understanding is that after a Fedora-based distribution varies too far from the standard Fedora build configuration, it becomes a remix and can no longer legally be called Fedora - they must pick a name, and modify everything with the Fedora trademark. What we've been talking about is creating a pure Fedora ppc32 build, focussing on getting the packages on the critical path, installs and Live CD/DVD creation working again. The latter is important for getting the video back into shape. Once the basics are running, then we have reached a point where more folks can begin to contribute and help get the remaining packages into shape, starting with what that contributor feels is important. Al _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
