Re: [PATCH 0/1] Modular Kernel packaging rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 04/02/2014 12:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:56:16AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 04/01/2014 04:48 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I'd really appreciate it if people could look the patch over and provide
further feedback and/or Acks.
Assuming you did not look into these things based on the affected
scope on the feature page but you are ensuring no breakage in Dracut
or Default enable services that expect modules to be available etc?
Given that a normal install will still be looking for kernel, and kernel
is a metapackage that requires kernel-core and kernel-drivers, the
installed set of content is identical to today.  So Server, Workstation,
existing installs should be fine.

The magic word should ;)


For Cloud, that's up to them to sort out given that they wanted the
smaller kernel.

Is this split good enough to used by embedded or can we expect another split ( or shaving of core or drivers ) if there emerges an embedded WG?

JBG
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux