Re: kernel split up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 13.03.2014 00:18, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> OK, initial builds of the packaging split I talked about last week are now at:
>>
>> Three things have since been pointed out to me.
>>
>> 1) Apparently some people have no idea what this is about.  Go read this thread:
>>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2014-March/005013.html
>>
>> 2) The kernel package is only 70k and has nothing in it.  This is
>> expected.  It's a metapackage that just requires kernel-core and
>> kernel-drivers to give you the equivalent of today's kernel package.
> 
> Sigh.  So bug #1: The provides in kernel-core and kernel-drivers are
> slightly off from what kernel needs.  kernel-core will install fine on
> it's own, but if you try to install/update kernel it won't work.
> Guess I'll be building again first thing in the morning.
> 
> josh


Builds, installs and runs OK.
http://goo.gl/uStZO5


poma

_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux