Am 28.02.2014 16:49, schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:13:29AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> It's been a while since I sent one of these. Mostly that's due to the >>> overlap between which upstream stable version we're using in Fedora >>> across the releases, and how fast those have been happening upstream. >>> We're settled on 3.13.y now, and with 3.14-rc4 out there things have >>> calmed down enough to take stock again. >>> >>> Here's the patches we have on top of 3.13.5. >>> >> >> Thanks for doing this, Josh. > > No problem. It helps me keep things straight and I usually find at > least a few odd things to follow up on as I go through things, so it's > worthwhile for me anyway. Glad someone else finds it useful too :) that Fedora now for a longer time has recent kernels instead the RHEL like backports in the past is not only usefull this is *great* and the IT world would be a better one if other components would have the same news/regression ratio __________________________ i remember F14 which was a great release but not supported my brand new SandyBridge machine in 2011 in case of the NIC and X11 often a day freezed for a minute or so bursting the joy of the new machine and leading in a forced upgrade to F15 a few days before my vacation that leaded to be forced unplanned to systemd, sukcing *all* early bugs, seeing mysqld-based services die around and finally destroy my vacations and make me mood for a very long time god bless you that now there is no fear in case of a new piece of hardware wait for the next fedora release and hope it will work sooner or later
_______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
