>> > It's generally useful. On other architectures the UDC capable hardware might >> > not be very common, but the dummy HCD makes it possible to use such hardware >> > for development and emulation of USB gadget driver code. >> > --- >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm wondering if you could apply this? > ... >> Why are they being put in extras where they were formerly for ARM in >> the main kernel package? This is functionality for some devices we >> depend on for things like virtual serial console and usb gadget >> network and in most cases ARM devices will have one of these ports so >> they're pretty much standard hardware on ARM. > > I thought they're not very commonly used, apparently I was wrong. > They're definitely not very commonly used on x86 (I don't think there > even exists a commonly used UDC there, our kernel does not currently > ship a driver for any), but there does not seem to be a way to put them > into extras package for a single platform. Maybe that would not be a > good idea anyway. Correct, the most common use case on x86 I suspect is the new baytrail devices that people like AdamW are playing with but I'm not sure what drivers they need/use. Peter _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
