On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2014 14:04:53 -0500 > Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:03 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > On 30.01.2014 18:19, Peter Robinson wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:12 PM, poma <pomidorabelisima@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Who builds these kernels? >> >>> Perhaps the better question is how can I actually find who builds >> >>> these kernels? :) >> >>> And if any exists, where is a git repo for these kernels? >> >> >> >> Generally it's jforbes. The config is basically the fedora kernel >> >> git repo with the debug options disabled. >> >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> > >> > So practically with the Rawhide "- Disable debugging options." >> > stage, Rawhide & RawhideKernelNodebug are on the same path? >> >> Yes. >> >> Also, rawhide kernels from koji aren't signed either. Signing of RPMs >> is only done late in the release process, and for updates to a stable >> release. > > To clarify what Josh said: > > rawhide _rpms_ are not signed. Only stable/branched Fedora versions > currently get signed rpms. > > rawhide kernel packages _are_ secure boot signed. (ie, they will work > on a secure boot enabled machine). > > rawhide nodebug packages are _not_ secure boot signed, as they are > scratch builds and not built in the secure boot channel. They will not > boot on a secure boot enabled machine. > > At least this is my understanding. Yes! Thanks for the clarification. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
