On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Josh Boyer schreef op ma 13-01-2014 om 15:41 [-0500]: >> As far as I know, nobody actually uses buildid to differentiate between >> kernel builds. > > Well, I do! OK, so it would be fairer to say "it is infrequently used". :) >> It's possible to simply append something to baserelease >> to mark it as a "non-official" build, and that's really all buildid is >> doing anway. > > I think it's easier (for my goals) to edit pkg_release to recreate > buildid's purpose. But, either way, that's not too much of an hassle as > I have to edit kernel.spec anyway whenever I create a local branch. That works as well. The point is to start removing some clutter from the kernel spec file, and this is somewhat low hanging fruit. I would simply rename "baserelease" to "buildid", but the rpmdev tools know about baserelease and we use those quite frequently. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
