On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:33:03 -0500 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:30:33PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:10:24 -0500 > > Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31:53PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > currently the crash driver is disabled in rawhide, but enabled > > > > as module in f20 and stabilization branch. The following > > > > snippet make it build on s390 > > > > > > > > diff -up a/arch/s390/mm/maccess.c.crash b/arch/s390/mm/maccess.c > > > > --- a/arch/s390/mm/maccess.c.crash 2013-11-26 > > > > 10:51:55.188222879 -0500 +++ b/arch/s390/mm/maccess.c > > > > 2013-11-26 10:52:43.718223592 -0500 @@ -228,3 +228,6 @@ void > > > > unxlate_dev_mem_ptr(unsigned long a if ((void *) addr != buf) > > > > free_page((unsigned long) buf); > > > > } > > > > + > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xlate_dev_mem_ptr); > > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(unxlate_dev_mem_ptr); > > > > > > > > I think it should get appended to the crash driver patch. > > > > > > Is this something anyone is in a position to test on s390x? I'm > > > fine with adding it to the patch, but if nobody is going to use > > > crash on s390x I'm curious if we should leave it enabled. > > > > crash itself is maintained by IBM for s390x, so I guess we should > > keep all arches the same when possible. Kyle probably has more > > information. > > > > I just tried the command from rhbz#492803 > > crash > > -d7 /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/3.13.0-0.rc1.git2.1.fc21.s390x/vmlinux > > on kernel with the crash driver enabled and it works if I can see. > > OK. please apply 97686d59 also to f20 and stabilization branches Dan _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel