Hi All, Every month I'm trying to publish a Fedora Kernel patch report that lists all of our patches and why we are carrying them. Thankfully, the past couple of times I've done this it's been pretty clear that for the most part we're just carrying fixes queued up to head to Linus soon. However, it also means I have to track down the status of that patch every month. I've been trying to keep PatchList.txt up to date, but that isn't scaling very well as it's easy for people to forget to add patches to it or remove them when we drop the patch. To help this tracking, I'd like to push the status information into each patch itself. What I propose is basically to fields at the top of each patch: Bugzilla: Upstream-status: The first is fairly self-evident. It just list the Red Hat Bugzilla number associated with the patch. If there isn't one, just put N/A. Upstream-status is fairly free-form at the moment, but the intention is to briefly capture when the patch is going to hit Linus' tree, or some other subsystem tree. This can be done fairly simply e.g.: Upstream-status: 3.13 Upstream-status: queued in net-next for 3.14 Upstream-status: <link to lkml or other mailing list thread> Upstream-status: Fedora Mustard Eventually I plan on writing a tool to scrape this information together for the report, but I wanted to get some feedback on the two fields for now. Do they seem pretty straight-forward? Do you have questions or other ideas/suggestions? If nobody screams much, I'll likely update all the patches in F20 and rawhide this week (I've already done some of them.) If we eventually get to some kind of patchwork style tracker, this shouldn't interfere at all and might actually help reviewers. Thanks. josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
