Re: Workstation product kernel requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 08:51 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> > We do have influence to a degree, but it's in areas other than new
> > feature/code development.  Dave is doing awesome things with Trinity
> > and Coverity.  Justin is working really hard on automated testing and
> > QA.  Though yes, we'd really like to start doing more upstream work.
> 
> Havin a set of automated test cases that cover areas of kernel
> functionality that are of interest to desktop-y uses would be awesome.
> 
> As for wishlist items: Having a union fs in the kernel would really help
> with application sandboxing. But I don't think that is an item for the
> Fedora kernel team...

That was the overlayfs mentioned in my original reply.
_______________________________________________
kernel mailing list
kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [USB]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux