On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > commit ac67590916a449d1e71a791f6a0c3688251ec074 > Author: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Oct 24 20:29:40 2013 +0100 > > Add patch for i.MX6 Utilite device dtb, drop old exynos patch I thought we discussed on IRC that patches were going to get sent to the list first? > diff --git a/config-arm-generic b/config-arm-generic > index 96a95e5..aaa88ee 100644 > --- a/config-arm-generic > +++ b/config-arm-generic > @@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ CONFIG_MFD_CORE=m > CONFIG_SMC91X=m > CONFIG_SMC911X=m > > -CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=m > - Why did this get dropped? The commit message doesn't say. > # CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST is not set > # CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set > # CONFIG_XEN is not set > diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec > index d1ea97d..19e9e4e 100644 > --- a/kernel.spec > +++ b/kernel.spec > @@ -675,7 +675,6 @@ Patch15000: nowatchdog-on-virt.patch > # lpae > Patch21001: arm-lpae-ax88796.patch > Patch21004: arm-sound-soc-samsung-dma-avoid-another-64bit-division.patch > -Patch21005: arm-exynos-mp.patch > > # ARM omap > Patch21010: arm-omap-load-tfp410.patch > @@ -683,6 +682,10 @@ Patch21010: arm-omap-load-tfp410.patch > # ARM tegra > Patch21020: arm-tegra-usb-no-reset-linux33.patch > > +# ARM i.MX6 > +# http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg08276.html > +Patch21030: arm-imx6-utilite.patch The link to the discussion is nice and I appreciate it. Though it shows that changes have been requested, the patch isn't queued, and it isn't really fully reviewed. I don't understand the urgency in adding something that doesn't appear to be ready according to upstream. Can you elaborate? josh _______________________________________________ kernel mailing list kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel
